Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
set decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
set decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1821
-
1822
-
1823
-
1824
-
1825
-
1826
Description of the myofascial release techniques.
Published 2024“…</b></p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty-eight patients (14 in CRT, 14 in CRT+MRT, and 10 in RUHB), with a mean age of 55 years and 50% male, completed the study. …”
-
1827
Study flow diagram.
Published 2024“…</b></p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty-eight patients (14 in CRT, 14 in CRT+MRT, and 10 in RUHB), with a mean age of 55 years and 50% male, completed the study. …”
-
1828
Clinical characteristics of the study population.
Published 2024“…</b></p><p>Results</p><p>Thirty-eight patients (14 in CRT, 14 in CRT+MRT, and 10 in RUHB), with a mean age of 55 years and 50% male, completed the study. …”
-
1829
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1830
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
1831
-
1832
-
1833
-
1834
-
1835
Changes in the active H3K27ac and repressive H3K27me3 histone marks among Vasa2+/Piwi1+ and all cells in fed, starved, and refed juvenile polyps.
Published 2025“…Significance levels after one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD for pairwise comparisons are indicated for adjusted <i>p</i> values: *<i>p < </i>0.05, **<i>p < </i>0.01; ****<i>p < </i>0.0001. d: day(s), n.s.: non-significant. See <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003525#pbio.3003525.s017" target="_blank">S6 Table</a> for mean values and statistical data and <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003525#pbio.3003525.s020" target="_blank">S1 Data</a> for individual numerical values.…”
-
1836
S1 File -
Published 2024“…</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>A clear learning effect was observed by the significant decrease in variability of the difference in the score between the expert and trainees over time. …”
-
1837
-
1838
-
1839
-
1840