Search alternatives:
year decrease » year increase (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
year decrease » year increase (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.
Published 2025“…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Predicted<sup>*</sup> value of age at school entry (in years), by level of height-for-age.
Published 2024Subjects: “…demographic surveillance system…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Increase in physical activity (100 step, 500 steps or 1000 steps) after the challenge according to decrease in screen time < or ≥60 minutes.
Published 2024“…<p>Increase in physical activity (100 step, 500 steps or 1000 steps) after the challenge according to decrease in screen time < or ≥60 minutes.…”
-
20
Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”