Search alternatives:
market decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
trained based » defined based (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search), trait based (Expand Search)
market decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
trained based » defined based (Expand Search), ranked based (Expand Search), trait based (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
App user base growth trends.
Published 2025“…Interrupted time series analyses found gradual adoption and sustained retention following intervention start, but significant decrease at campaign end.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>A context‑adapted, multi‑channel marketing strategy markedly improved adoption and retention of the WHO SkinNTDs app among Cameroonian FHWs. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
AdaBoost training flowchart.
Published 2025“…HINGO enhances the uniformity of the initial population distribution by means of refraction opposition-based learning strategy in initialization, and improves the local and global search ability of the algorithm by means of sine and cosine strategy, Lévy flight and nonlinear decreasing factor in the search stage. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Market structure of e-commerce platforms.
Published 2025“…Based on the network externality perspective, considering the duopoly e-commerce platform market, this paper uses game theory to construct a theoretical model to compare and analyze the changes in consumers, merchants, platforms, and social total welfare when the reputation information of e-commerce products is symmetric and asymmetric. …”
-
12
A sample choice question with a warning label.
Published 2024“…The rapid increase in SSB consumption in China necessitates robust regulations. This study employed a choice experiment to simulate the market scenario in which a text warning label was presented on SSBs. …”
-
13
-
14
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”
-
15
-
16
A sample choice question without a warning label.
Published 2024“…The rapid increase in SSB consumption in China necessitates robust regulations. This study employed a choice experiment to simulate the market scenario in which a text warning label was presented on SSBs. …”
-
17
-
18
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”