Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
cnn decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
cnn decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
5
-
6
Training Data/Validation/Test.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
7
-
8
CNN Model Architecture.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
9
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
Flowchart of Proposed SMO_CNN.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
13
CNN Model Layers Summary.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Performance Results of Proposed SMO_CNN Model.
Published 2025“…Every model was subjected to individual testing. The SMO_CNN model we developed demonstrated exceptional testing and training accuracies of 98.95% and 99.20% respectively, surpassing CNN, VGG19, and ResNet50 models. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Detailed breakdown of sex-biased model performance across different sex-specific test subsets.
Published 2025Subjects: