Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…<p>Using the invasion model, we investigate the effect of switching on and off (black vs grey) invasions with mutualisms halfway through the simulation (i.e. after 500 assembly events). …”
-
3
Data Sheet 1_Single radiation exposure induces gut microbiota dysbiosis and decreases short-chain fatty acid metabolism and intestinal barrier integrity in mice.docx
Published 2025“…Mice were exposed to a single dose (1 Gy, one exposure; dose rate: 2.6 Gy/min) or fractionated doses (1 Gy accumulated over 75 fractions, 6.7 mGy/min for 2 min per session). …”
-
4
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Table_2_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in inf...
Published 2024“…Specifically, infants who were exposed to postnatal maternal probiotics (between the 1- and 6-month study visits) via breastfeeding/breastmilk, had larger differential responses between familiar and novel visual stimuli with respect to the late slow wave component of the EEG, which may indicate greater memory updating potential. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Overview of study procedures.
Published 2025“…CONTROL (1.32 (SD: 2.80) vs. 0.55 (SD: 1.99) rungs, p < 0.001), with greater improvements for those with lower baseline intent. …”