Showing 101 - 120 results of 18,828 for search '(( using ((a decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( a ((large decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.86s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…(<b>B</b>) Minimum and maximum bias in a long 1D array with rectified cosine tuning. Bias expressed in terms of the distance between neurons in a linear population of equally spaced neurons. …”
  4. 104

    Data of the article "The physiological cost of being hot: High thermal stress and disturbance decrease energy reserves in dragonflies in the wild" by Eduardo Ulises Castillo-Pérez (20869904)

    Published 2025
    “…Despite this, individuals from disturbed sites were larger but had lower energy reserves than those from preserved sites. …”
  5. 105
  6. 106
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112
  13. 113
  14. 114
  15. 115
  16. 116
  17. 117
  18. 118

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  19. 119

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  20. 120

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”