Showing 1 - 20 results of 17,735 for search '(( using ((shap decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( a ((greatest decrease) OR (largest decrease)) ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)<sup>a</sup> showing the greatest fold changes from each potato tissue: 10 with greatest increase in expression and 10 with greatest decrease in expression. by Margaret A. Carpenter (6104180)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)<sup>a</sup> showing the greatest fold changes from each potato tissue: 10 with greatest increase in expression and 10 with greatest decrease in expression.…”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    SHAP waterfall plot. by Wentao Yang (205781)

    Published 2025
    “…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
  11. 11

    SHAP decision plot. by Wentao Yang (205781)

    Published 2025
    “…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
  12. 12

    SHAP dependence plots. by Wentao Yang (205781)

    Published 2025
    “…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20

    SHAP dependence plots with interaction coloring. by Wentao Yang (205781)

    Published 2025
    “…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”