Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
latest decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search), latency decreased (Expand Search)
shap decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
latest decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search), latency decreased (Expand Search)
shap decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
CM-DWM-EC chart using 30% decrease in the mean for the E(KeV).
Published 2024“…<p>CM-DWM-EC chart using 30% decrease in the mean for the E(KeV).</p>…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
SHAP waterfall plot.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
13
SHAP decision plot.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
14
SHAP dependence plots.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
Flow of premises through the study.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Methods and findings</p><p>The study was conducted between February and May 2023, in 13 licensed premises in England. It used an A-B-A reversal design, set over 3 consecutive 4-weekly periods with “A” representing the nonintervention periods during which standard serving sizes were served, and “B” representing the intervention period when the largest serving size of draught beer (1 imperial pint (568 ml)) was removed from existing ranges so that the largest size available was two-thirds of a pint. …”
-
18
SHAP dependence plots with interaction coloring.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
19
-
20
The numerical data used in this study.
Published 2025“…In terms of the percentage decreases in anti-mumps antibody titers, in the population receiving the 1-dose vaccine, there was a mean decrease of 2.06% per year. …”