Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
shap decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
shap decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)<sup>a</sup> showing the greatest fold changes from each potato tissue: 10 with greatest increase in expression and 10 with greatest decrease in expression.
Published 2025“…<p>Differentially expressed genes (DEGs)<sup>a</sup> showing the greatest fold changes from each potato tissue: 10 with greatest increase in expression and 10 with greatest decrease in expression.…”
-
2
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
SHAP waterfall plot.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
16
SHAP decision plot.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
17
SHAP dependence plots.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
18
SHAP dependence plots with interaction coloring.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
19
-
20