Showing 61 - 80 results of 8,806 for search '(( using ((spot decrease) OR (we decrease)) ) OR ( a ((large decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62

    Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Imaging of Dynamic pH Changes in Lysosomes during Cancer Cell Invasion on a Microfluidic Chip by Sijia Liu (1751842)

    Published 2025
    “…While existing studies have primarily focused on lysosomal pH changes during processes such as lysosomal membrane damage leading to cell death, investigations into lysosomal pH alterations during cell invasion have been largely overlooked. Here, we present a method to analyze lysosomal pH changes during cancer cell invasion using a microfluidic chip-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technique for real-time imaging. …”
  3. 63
  4. 64

    Data for Fig 1. by Rachael M. Giersch (22331947)

    Published 2025
    “…We also observe a significant decrease in survival in animals that progress to >10% cancer in their hemolymph, while we see no effect on survival in clams with BTN that are long-term non-progressors. …”
  5. 65
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68

    MarBTN-specific eDNA detection in each clam that was followed for MarBTN in hemolymph and eDNA. by Rachael M. Giersch (22331947)

    Published 2025
    “…In a second clam (FFM-22H11), the cancer decreased but it did not survive more than 8 weeks after this drop, so under our conservative criteria, we consider it to be progression. …”
  9. 69

    The raw data used for the analyses in this study. by Masakazu Tsujimoto (22339504)

    Published 2025
    “…In the JS-10 phantom, the DL remained stable under all conditions. The RC decreased when the Gaussian filter was large and the SI product was small. …”
  10. 70
  11. 71
  12. 72
  13. 73
  14. 74
  15. 75

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  16. 76

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  17. 77

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  18. 78
  19. 79
  20. 80