Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
stat decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
stat decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Withdrawal of Type I JAKinibs increased STAT phosphorylation, a phenomenon present but markedly lower in Type II JAKinibs.
Published 2025“…(A) pJAK2 peaked at time zero after exposure to baricitinib and ruxolitinib and then decreases. There was no increase in pJAK2 with CHZ868 treatment; (B) pSTAT1 proportion peaked after 60 minutes and was greater after Type I JAKinib withdrawal than Type II JAKinib withdrawal; <b>(C)</b> The pSTAT2 proportion peaked 60 minutes after Type I JAKinib withdrawal but this phenomenon was not seen with Type II JAKinib withdrawal.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Improving QoL through the use of STAT-ON™.
Published 2025“…While medication costs may increase, overall direct healthcare expenses decrease, leading to net savings. As an example, the study estimates potential cost reductions of up to €137.8 million in Germany and €19 million in Sweden when STAT-ON™ is used to detect advanced PD symptoms. …”
-
12
-
13
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”