Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
latest decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search), latency decreased (Expand Search)
shap decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
latest decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search), latency decreased (Expand Search)
shap decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
SHAP waterfall plot.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
2
SHAP decision plot.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
3
SHAP dependence plots.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
4
SHAP dependence plots with interaction coloring.
Published 2025“…Across 10 models, CatBoost performed best on the test set (AUC = 0.970, accuracy = 0.920, F1 = 0.918), with robust calibration and decision-curve net benefit. SHAP interpretation ranked eGDR among the most influential predictors: SHAP summary and dependence plots indicated that higher eGDR decreased the model’s predicted probability of frailty. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Trust change by gender.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
14
Trust change by age group.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
15
Trust change by education level.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
16
Trust change by source of science information.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20