Showing 1 - 20 results of 2,961 for search '(( using split decrease ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Splitting tensile strength. by Jie Liu (15128)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared to the control group and individual addition of basalt fibers or polycarboxylate superplasticizer, the group with both basalt fibers and polycarboxylate superplasticizer had 33.00%, 16.67%, and 14.66% higher compressive strength and 52.00%, 31.03%, and 28.09% higher splitting tensile strength, respectively. Furthermore, the combined optimization improved the durability, decreased the thermal shrinkage by 49.85%, 32.35%, and 28.84%, and decreased the drying shrinkage by 68.95%, 33.15%, and 47.58%. …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    Comparison of splitting tensile strength values. by Jun Wan (126294)

    Published 2025
    “…The results indicate that the optimal LS incorporation (20%) enhances compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength by 12.7%, 11.9%, and 9.16%, respectively, while maintaining adequate workability. …”
  18. 18

    Loading diagram of splitting tensile test. by Jun Wan (126294)

    Published 2025
    “…The results indicate that the optimal LS incorporation (20%) enhances compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and flexural strength by 12.7%, 11.9%, and 9.16%, respectively, while maintaining adequate workability. …”
  19. 19
  20. 20

    The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

    Published 2025
    “…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”