Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
npv decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
value » values (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
npv decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), 026 decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
value » values (Expand Search)
-
1
Positive predictive value and negative predictive value for serum cysticercosis tests.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
Serum cysticercosis test results vs computed tomography for neurocysticercosis (N = 36).
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of people with epilepsy (N = 223).
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
Distribution of serum cysticercosis tests and neuroimaging (Computed Tomography).
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
Flowchart of the recruitment of people with epilepsy in the participating mental clinics.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Data Sheet 1_Emotional prompting amplifies disinformation generation in AI large language models.docx
Published 2025“…Introduction<p>The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs), which can produce text that closely resembles human-written content, presents both opportunities and risks. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes + : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). (a) and (b): Average negative predictive value for and , respectively for and . …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20