Showing 141 - 160 results of 3,785 for search '(( values ((were decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( a ((latest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.55s Refine Results
  1. 141
  2. 142

    Clear tables by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  3. 143

    Data from the picture table in the paper. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  4. 144

    Concrete mix proportion. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  5. 145

    Clear pictures in the paper. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  6. 146

    Prefabricated fractured granite-concrete model. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  7. 147

    PFC simulation mesoscopic parameters. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  8. 148

    Principle of energy calculation. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  9. 149

    Parameters PFC simulation microscopic. by Qingwen Li (1510687)

    Published 2025
    “…The results show that when the relative area is constant, the larger the fracture dip angle is, the compressive strength of the composite body presents a similar “peak” type change; the dip angle appears to have the maximum value at 60 <sup>o</sup> and 90<sup>o</sup> and the minimum value at 0 <sup>o</sup> and 30 <sup>o</sup>, while the peak elastic modulus presents a “waterfall” type change, and the maximum value appears at 90<sup>o</sup>. …”
  10. 150
  11. 151
  12. 152
  13. 153
  14. 154
  15. 155
  16. 156
  17. 157
  18. 158
  19. 159
  20. 160