Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,402 for search '(( variables ((n decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( a ((large decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.63s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas by Malena Sibaja Leyton (18400983)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">#METADATA</p><p dir="ltr">#'data.frame': 472 obs. of 28 variables:</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ ID: Factor variable; a unique identity for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Year: Factor variable; six factors available (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021) representing the year for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually lost</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually alive</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Education: Factor variable; four factors are available ("Self-taught","Learned from another melip","Intro training","Formal tech training"), representing the training level in meliponiculture</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Operation_Size: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies managed by the participant (in n)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propAgri: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of agricultural area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propForest: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of forested area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_annual: Numeric variable; representing the average annual temperature (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_annual_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Oct_March_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Apri_Sept_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Oct_March: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Apri_Sept: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Importance_dead: Factor variable; three factors are available Normal","High","Very high"), representing the perception of the significance of annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Climatic_environmental: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered climatic and environmental problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Contamination: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered contamination problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Nutritional: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered nutritional problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Sanitary: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered sanitary problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Queen: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered queen problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Time: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Economic: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered economic problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Attacks: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time attacks as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Swarming: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered swarming problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p><br></p>…”
  4. 4

    <b>Supporting data for manuscript</b> "<b>Voluntary locomotion induces an early and remote hemodynamic decrease in the large cerebral veins</b>" by Kira Shaw (18796168)

    Published 2025
    “…The MATLAB file 'dvpaper_tstraces_meningeal.mat' contains the individual hemodynamic traces across all included locomotion events (N=1224) where a meningeal vessel was detectable in the thin cranial window. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Survival of soft-shell clams with MarBTN compared to control clams. by Rachael M. Giersch (22331947)

    Published 2025
    “…(<i>B</i>) Analysis of long-term non-progressing clams (n = 11, light red line), along with their respective paired controls (blue line), shows no difference in survival with maintained low-level infection. (C) A sub-analysis of low-positive clams in which MarBTN progressed and did not regress (n = 9, dark red line), with survival starting at the time the clam was detected with >10% cancer, compared with their paired control clams starting at the same date (blue line), shows a significant decrease in time-to death. “+” marks the dates at which two negative control animals were culled before natural death (these events were censored in the survival analysis).…”
  14. 14

    MarBTN-specific eDNA detection in each clam that was followed for MarBTN in hemolymph and eDNA. by Rachael M. Giersch (22331947)

    Published 2025
    “…The animal with clear regression is FFM-21A1. In a second clam (FFM-22H11), the cancer decreased but it did not survive more than 8 weeks after this drop, so under our conservative criteria, we consider it to be progression. …”
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20