Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
were decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
were decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…On average, meliponiculturists lost 43.4 % of their stingless bee colonies annually, 33.3 % during the rainy season, and 22.0 % during the dry season. We found that colony losses during the rainy season decreased with higher abundance of forested areas and increased with higher abundance of agricultural area around meliponaries. …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…Mean respiratory rate, variability of respiratory rate (VRR), and variability of tidal volume (VTV) were measured continuously and non-invasively with a bio-impedance method. …”
-
5
-
6
Summary statistics of key variables.
Published 2024“…We find that in developing countries, as urban economic density increases, innovation first increases and then begins to decrease beyond a certain point, with the decline being most prominent in the largest cities. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
ROC analysis to mark selectivity results in mostly mixed-selective units.
Published 2025“…The large number of mixed selective units also results in a significant decrease in accuracy when these neurons are targeted as compared to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013559#pcbi.1013559.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6c</a> where there was no significant effect visible after targeting mixed selective units, likely because there were less mixed selective units present. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
Data for Fig 1.
Published 2025“…We also observe a significant decrease in survival in animals that progress to >10% cancer in their hemolymph, while we see no effect on survival in clams with BTN that are long-term non-progressors. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Survival of soft-shell clams with MarBTN compared to control clams.
Published 2025“…(<i>B</i>) Analysis of long-term non-progressing clams (n = 11, light red line), along with their respective paired controls (blue line), shows no difference in survival with maintained low-level infection. (C) A sub-analysis of low-positive clams in which MarBTN progressed and did not regress (n = 9, dark red line), with survival starting at the time the clam was detected with >10% cancer, compared with their paired control clams starting at the same date (blue line), shows a significant decrease in time-to death. “+” marks the dates at which two negative control animals were culled before natural death (these events were censored in the survival analysis).…”
-
20