Showing 1 - 20 results of 5,641 for search '(( via large decrease ) OR ((( _ web decrease ) OR ( a ((step decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))))', query time: 0.41s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Table of step height. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  2. 2

    The well wall step. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease. by Joshua Looker (21390948)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
  8. 8

    Apoptosis inhibitor prevented the decrease of IIL ESP-induced TJs expression and alleviated barrier disruption of Caco-2 monolayer. by Qi Qi Lu (17721401)

    Published 2025
    “…<p><b>A:</b> Apoptosis inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK pretreatment increased the IIL ESP-decreased TEER. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20