Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
were small » were all (Expand Search), bert small (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,793 for search '(( were small decrease ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

    <b>The loss of insulin-positive cell clusters precedes the decrease of islet frequency and beta cell area in type 1 diabetes</b> by Denise M. Drotar (21679539)

    Published 2025
    “…Insulin-positive (INS+) single cells (≤10µm), cell clusters (>10 to <35µm), small- and medium-sized islets (35-100µm and 100-200µm) were significantly lost at type 1 diabetes onset, while large INS+ islets (>200µm) were preserved. …”
  16. 16

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  17. 17

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  18. 18

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  19. 19
  20. 20