Search alternatives:
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
ng decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
221
-
222
-
223
Activation of farnesoid X receptor acts as a central molecular switch in intestinal IRI to decrease inflammation and protect intestinal barrier integrity with subsequent prevention of bacterial translocation.
Published 2017“…<p>IRI: Ischemia reperfusion injury; FXR: Farnesoid X receptor. (Continuous line in case of an increased/stimulatory effect; dashed line in case of a decreased/inhibitory effect.)…”
-
224
Decreased activity of FASII favors the cold growth of the <i>ΔcshA</i> strain.
Published 2020“…<p><b>(A)</b><i>fapR</i> mRNA levels decrease in ACC and biotin related suppressor strains. …”
-
225
-
226
-
227
-
228
-
229
-
230
-
231
-
232
-
233
-
234
The phosphorylation of FgHapX mediated by the Ser/Thr kinase FgYak1 is required for the transcriptional activity of FgHapX.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) The mutations of FgHapX at 245 and 338 from Ser to Ala or loss of FgYak1 led to a decreased phosphorylation level of FgHapX. …”
-
235
Extracellular vesicles isolated from patients undergoing remote ischemic preconditioning decrease hypoxia-evoked apoptosis of cardiomyoblasts after isoflurane but not propofol expo...
Published 2020“…Serum nanoparticle concentrations in patients had increased sixty minutes after RIPC compared to Sham (2.5x10<sup>11</sup>±4.9x10<sup>10</sup> nanoparticles/ml; Sham: 1.2x10<sup>11</sup>±2.0x10<sup>10</sup>; p = 0.04). …”
-
236
-
237
-
238
-
239
-
240