Search alternatives:
code » core (Expand Search)
Showing 241 - 260 results of 365 for search 'code ((detection algorithm) OR (encryption algorithm))', query time: 0.23s Refine Results
  1. 241
  2. 242
  3. 243
  4. 244

    Mobility Analysis: Home and Work Detection from Network Signaling Data (NSD) by Alexe Vlad (20556224)

    Published 2025
    “…Researchers can adapt the code to similar mobility datasets to investigate commuting trends and urban mobility structures.…”
  5. 245
  6. 246
  7. 247
  8. 248
  9. 249
  10. 250
  11. 251
  12. 252
  13. 253
  14. 254
  15. 255
  16. 256

    Quantitative results on WEDU dataset. by Dunlu Lu (19964225)

    Published 2024
    “…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
  17. 257

    Counting results on DRPD dataset. by Dunlu Lu (19964225)

    Published 2024
    “…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
  18. 258

    Quantitative results on RFRB dataset. by Dunlu Lu (19964225)

    Published 2024
    “…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
  19. 259

    Main module structure. by Dunlu Lu (19964225)

    Published 2024
    “…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”
  20. 260

    Counting results on MTDC-UAV dataset. by Dunlu Lu (19964225)

    Published 2024
    “…In comparative experiments on four plant datasets, MAR-YOLOv9 improved the mAP@0.5 accuracy by 39.18% compared to seven mainstream object detection algorithms, and by 1.28% compared to the YOLOv9 model. …”