Showing 141 - 145 results of 145 for search 'error decomposition algorithm', query time: 0.22s Refine Results
  1. 141

    SNR comparison of real-field seismic profile. by Zhenjing Yao (22189970)

    Published 2025
    “…We propose a novel seismic random noise suppression method based on enhanced variational mode decomposition (VMD) with grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm, which applies the envelope entropy to evaluate the wolf individual fitness, determine the grey wolf hierarchy, and obtain the optimized key elements <i><i>K</i></i> and <i>α</i> in VMD. …”
  2. 142

    The flowchart of GWO-VMD method. by Zhenjing Yao (22189970)

    Published 2025
    “…We propose a novel seismic random noise suppression method based on enhanced variational mode decomposition (VMD) with grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm, which applies the envelope entropy to evaluate the wolf individual fitness, determine the grey wolf hierarchy, and obtain the optimized key elements <i><i>K</i></i> and <i>α</i> in VMD. …”
  3. 143

    The 147th single trace. by Zhenjing Yao (22189970)

    Published 2025
    “…We propose a novel seismic random noise suppression method based on enhanced variational mode decomposition (VMD) with grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm, which applies the envelope entropy to evaluate the wolf individual fitness, determine the grey wolf hierarchy, and obtain the optimized key elements <i><i>K</i></i> and <i>α</i> in VMD. …”
  4. 144

    Data Sheet 1_Short-term load forecasting based on multi-frequency sequence feature analysis and multi-point modified FEDformer.docx by Kaiyuan Hou (17075968)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Given the complexity and dynamic nature of short-term load sequence data, coupled with prevalent errors in traditional forecasting methods, this study introduces a novel approach for short-term load forecasting. …”
  5. 145

    An Ecological Benchmark of Photo Editing Software: A Comparative Analysis of Local vs. Cloud Workflows by Pierre-Alexis DELAROCHE (22092572)

    Published 2025
    “…Performance Profiling Algorithms Energy Measurement Methodology # Pseudo-algorithmic representation of measurement protocol def capture_energy_metrics(workflow_type: WorkflowEnum, asset_vector: List[PhotoAsset]) -> EnergyProfile: baseline_power = sample_idle_power_draw(duration=30) with PowerMonitoringContext() as pmc: start_timestamp = rdtsc() # Read time-stamp counter if workflow_type == WorkflowEnum.LOCAL: result = execute_local_pipeline(asset_vector) elif workflow_type == WorkflowEnum.CLOUD: result = execute_cloud_pipeline(asset_vector) end_timestamp = rdtsc() energy_profile = EnergyProfile( duration=cycles_to_seconds(end_timestamp - start_timestamp), peak_power=pmc.get_peak_consumption(), average_power=pmc.get_mean_consumption(), total_energy=integrate_power_curve(pmc.get_power_trace()) ) return energy_profile Statistical Analysis Framework Our analytical pipeline employs advanced statistical methodologies including: Variance Decomposition: ANOVA with nested factors for hardware configuration effects Regression Analysis: Generalized Linear Models (GLM) with log-link functions for energy modeling Temporal Analysis: Fourier transform-based frequency domain analysis of power consumption patterns Cluster Analysis: K-means clustering with Euclidean distance metrics for workflow classification Data Validation and Quality Assurance Measurement Uncertainty Quantification All energy measurements incorporate systematic and random error propagation analysis: Instrument Precision: ±0.1W for CPU power, ±0.5W for GPU power Temporal Resolution: 1ms sampling with Nyquist frequency considerations Calibration Protocol: NIST-traceable power standards with periodic recalibration Environmental Controls: Temperature-compensated measurements in climate-controlled facility Outlier Detection Algorithms Statistical outliers are identified using the Interquartile Range (IQR) method with Tukey's fence criteria (Q₁ - 1.5×IQR, Q₃ + 1.5×IQR). …”