Showing 1 - 20 results of 682 for search 'processing method called', query time: 0.23s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    DBN-GRU Feature Processing Accuracy Levels. by Heena Kauser.Sk (21387794)

    Published 2025
    “…The model extracts static features (permissions, API calls, intent filters) and dynamic features (system calls, network activity, inter-process communication) from Android APKs, enabling a comprehensive analysis of application behavior.The proposed model was trained and tested on the Drebin dataset, which includes 129,013 applications (5,560 malware and 123,453 benign).Performance evaluation against NMLA-AMDCEF, MalVulDroid, and LinRegDroid demonstrated that DBN-GRU achieved 98.7% accuracy, 98.5% precision, 98.9% recall, and an AUC of 0.99, outperforming conventional models.In addition, it exhibits faster preprocessing, feature extraction, and malware classification times, making it suitable for real-time deployment.By bridging static and dynamic detection methodologies, the DBN-GRU enhances malware detection capabilities while reducing false positives and computational overhead.These findings confirm the applicability of the proposed model in real-world Android security applications, offering a scalable and high-performance malware detection solution.…”
  11. 11

    DBN-GRU feature processing accuracy levels. by Heena Kauser.Sk (21387794)

    Published 2025
    “…The model extracts static features (permissions, API calls, intent filters) and dynamic features (system calls, network activity, inter-process communication) from Android APKs, enabling a comprehensive analysis of application behavior.The proposed model was trained and tested on the Drebin dataset, which includes 129,013 applications (5,560 malware and 123,453 benign).Performance evaluation against NMLA-AMDCEF, MalVulDroid, and LinRegDroid demonstrated that DBN-GRU achieved 98.7% accuracy, 98.5% precision, 98.9% recall, and an AUC of 0.99, outperforming conventional models.In addition, it exhibits faster preprocessing, feature extraction, and malware classification times, making it suitable for real-time deployment.By bridging static and dynamic detection methodologies, the DBN-GRU enhances malware detection capabilities while reducing false positives and computational overhead.These findings confirm the applicability of the proposed model in real-world Android security applications, offering a scalable and high-performance malware detection solution.…”
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20