Showing 41 - 60 results of 129 for search 'python models represent', query time: 0.18s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42
  3. 43
  4. 44
  5. 45

    Cost functions implemented in Neuroptimus. by Máté Mohácsi (20469514)

    Published 2024
    “…<div><p>Finding optimal parameters for detailed neuronal models is a ubiquitous challenge in neuroscientific research. …”
  6. 46

    Data features examined for potential biases. by Harry Hochheiser (3413396)

    Published 2025
    “…Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.…”
  7. 47

    Analysis topics. by Harry Hochheiser (3413396)

    Published 2025
    “…Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.…”
  8. 48

    Datasets To EVAL. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  9. 49

    Statistical significance test results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  10. 50

    How RAG work. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  11. 51

    OpenBookQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  12. 52

    AI2_ARC experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  13. 53

    TQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  14. 54

    E-EVAL experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  15. 55

    TQA Accuracy Comparison Chart on different LLM. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  16. 56

    ScienceQA experimental results. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  17. 57

    Code interpreter with LLM. by Jin Lu (428513)

    Published 2025
    “…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
  18. 58

    JASPEX model by Olugbenga OLUWAGBEMI (21403187)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p dir="ltr">We wrote new sets of python codes and developed python programming codes to rework on the map to generate the coloured map of Southwest Nigeria from the map of Nigeria (which represented the region of our study). …”
  19. 59

    Scope of our collection of pathogen models of metabolism. by Emma M. Glass (13102872)

    Published 2024
    “…The average MEMOTE score across models is 84% (d–f) Boxplots representing the spread of genes, reactions, and metabolites in each model, classified by phylum. …”
  20. 60

    Advancing Solar Magnetic Field Modeling by Carlos António (21257432)

    Published 2025
    “…<br><br>We developed a significantly faster Python code built upon a functional optimization framework previously proposed and implemented by our team. …”