Search alternatives:
models representing » model representing (Expand Search), models represent (Expand Search), samples representing (Expand Search)
python models » python code (Expand Search), motion models (Expand Search), pelton models (Expand Search)
models representing » model representing (Expand Search), models represent (Expand Search), samples representing (Expand Search)
python models » python code (Expand Search), motion models (Expand Search), pelton models (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
Data features examined for potential biases.
Published 2025“…Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.…”
-
46
Analysis topics.
Published 2025“…Representativeness of the population, differences in calibration and model performance among groups, and differences in performance across hospital settings were identified as possible sources of bias.…”
-
47
Datasets To EVAL.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
48
Statistical significance test results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
49
How RAG work.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
50
OpenBookQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
51
AI2_ARC experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
52
TQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
53
E-EVAL experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
54
TQA Accuracy Comparison Chart on different LLM.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
55
ScienceQA experimental results.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
56
Code interpreter with LLM.
Published 2025“…We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets—AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA—which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10−15 percentage points. …”
-
57
JASPEX model
Published 2025“…</p><p dir="ltr">We wrote new sets of python codes and developed python programming codes to rework on the map to generate the coloured map of Southwest Nigeria from the map of Nigeria (which represented the region of our study). …”
-
58
Scope of our collection of pathogen models of metabolism.
Published 2024“…The average MEMOTE score across models is 84% (d–f) Boxplots representing the spread of genes, reactions, and metabolites in each model, classified by phylum. …”
-
59
Advancing Solar Magnetic Field Modeling
Published 2025“…<br><br>We developed a significantly faster Python code built upon a functional optimization framework previously proposed and implemented by our team. …”
-
60