Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7741
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7742
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7743
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7744
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7745
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7746
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7747
Funnel plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
7748
-
7749
Image 3_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7750
Image 4_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7751
Image 2_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7752
Image 1_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif
Published 2024“…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
-
7753
-
7754
Modulation of performance during learning.
Published 2025“…The ‘W<sub>exp</sub>’ value shows the weight of the exponential component in each distribution. (B) A longitudinal comparison of the average exponential fit weight between WT and zQ175 mice reveals that while WT mice show a decreasing trend, indicating a shift towards longer duration (“timed”) trials, zQ175 mice maintain a consistently high exponential weight, demonstrating no significant change over time (b; RM two-way ANOVA, genotype p = 0.0106 F(1, 22) = 7.795, days p < 0.0001 F(5.262, 115.4) = 7.616, interaction p < 0.0001 F(57, 1250) = 2.834). …”
-
7755
-
7756
Supplementary Material for: Novel Protocol for the Use of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System in Adolescents Engaged in Contact Sports.
Published 2024“…After starting AHCL, the average participant time spent in the target glucose range (70-180mg/dL) was 79.34±8.46%, and no significant change was observed during the camp (mean difference +0.79±8.24%, p=0.7581). …”
-
7757
Table 1_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.docx
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7758
Image 4_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7759
Image 2_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
-
7760
Image 3_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png
Published 2025“…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”