Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
8741
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
8742
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
8743
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
8744
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
8745
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
8746
Multiple comparisons after ANOVA(CR10).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8747
Homogeneity test of CR10.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8748
Illustration of the fNIRS device worn.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8749
Analysis of variance of HbO<sub>2</sub> in bilateral PFC.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8750
fNIRS equipment coordinates.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8751
Changes of muscle oxygen saturation.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8752
Analysis of variance of CR10.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8753
Placement on the forehead.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8754
IMW intervention plan design.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
-
8755
-
8756
Table 1_Factors affecting health-seeking behavior in sports climbers in Metro Manila: a cross-sectional study.docx
Published 2025“…Among the injury factors studied, the location of pain at the hip/pelvis and knee was found to be significant (p < 0.05).</p>Discussion<p>Climbers in Metro Manila have a decreased tendency to engage in health-seeking behavior. …”
-
8757
Data Sheet 1_Efficacy and safety of different medications compared for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a network meta-analysis.pdf
Published 2025“…The secondary outcomes showed a significant effect of hydromorphone in improving sleep quality (MD = −3.8, 95% CI: [−23.0, −15.0]) and decreasing pain questionnaire scores (MD = −13.0, 95% CI: [−28.0, 2.1]). …”
-
8758
Data Sheet 6_Efficacy and safety of different medications compared for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a network meta-analysis.pdf
Published 2025“…The secondary outcomes showed a significant effect of hydromorphone in improving sleep quality (MD = −3.8, 95% CI: [−23.0, −15.0]) and decreasing pain questionnaire scores (MD = −13.0, 95% CI: [−28.0, 2.1]). …”
-
8759
Data Sheet 3_Efficacy and safety of different medications compared for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a network meta-analysis.pdf
Published 2025“…The secondary outcomes showed a significant effect of hydromorphone in improving sleep quality (MD = −3.8, 95% CI: [−23.0, −15.0]) and decreasing pain questionnaire scores (MD = −13.0, 95% CI: [−28.0, 2.1]). …”
-
8760
Data Sheet 2_Efficacy and safety of different medications compared for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a network meta-analysis.pdf
Published 2025“…The secondary outcomes showed a significant effect of hydromorphone in improving sleep quality (MD = −3.8, 95% CI: [−23.0, −15.0]) and decreasing pain questionnaire scores (MD = −13.0, 95% CI: [−28.0, 2.1]). …”