Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7381
Methodological workflow used in the study.
Published 2025“…From the analysis it was observed that the forest cover showed a major variation with the interval, decreasing from 234634 ha (76%) in 1988 to 168476 ha (54%) in 2019 with an annual loss of 2134.13 ha/year. …”
-
7382
Supplementary Material for: Alcohol use and types and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2025“…Moderate alcohol use was associated with significant decrease in ischemic stroke risk (RR=0.87; 95% CI 0.83-0.92) while heavy alcohol use was associated with significant increase in ischemic stroke risk (RR=1.31; 95% CI 1.19-1.44). …”
-
7383
-
7384
Data Sheet 1_Remarkable tumor response to Iruplinalkib in a 14-year-old girl with ALK-positive advanced metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer: a case report.pdf
Published 2025“…We report a rare case of a 14-year-old girl, whose father and grandfather both had lung cancer, diagnosed with advanced, multi-site metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. …”
-
7385
Data Sheet 1_Choroidal thickness as a biomarker of systemic inflammation in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica.docx
Published 2025“…We found a significant decrease in all laboratory and clinical parameters. …”
-
7386
Supplementary Material for: Trends in the Incidence of Rare Eyelid Malignancies: A SEER-Based Study (2000–2021)
Published 2025“…For SGC; ARIMA (0,0,0) model demonstrated a decline in IR in 2011 (IR = 0.0192), increase until 2019, then decrease in 2021 (IR = 0.0246), with a predicted 10-year decrease to 0.026 (95% PI: 0.019–0.032). …”
-
7387
Efficacy of lifting devices for wheelchair transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2024“…Motorised lifting devices significantly decreased biomechanical stress among nurses [SMD −0.68; 95% CI −1.02 to −0.34], whereas non-motorised counterparts showed no significant change [SMD − 0.23; 95% CI −0.59 to 0.13]. …”
-
7388
Data Sheet 1_Effectiveness of infection control measures informed by a modified Blue-Carba test in reducing rectal carriage of carbapenemase-producing bacteria in general wards: a...
Published 2025“…Briefly, the NA included as key steps a 6-hour pre-incubation at 37 °C in nutrient broth, followed by a 15-minute centrifugation at 3,200 rpm. …”
-
7389
RSA results across a broader frequency band (0.1–150 Hz).
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> For the translation epochs from good trials, the similarity of Same Context was significantly greater than the similarity of Different Context in HC. …”
-
7390
Parameters of Tissue Doppler Echocardiography.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Out of 50 patients, two showed a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the normal range (<55%) one month post-treatment, along with significant increases in Troponin I levels. …”
-
7391
Hardness preference in <i>Drosophila</i> larvae, as a relevant cue for varying feeding substrates.
Published 2025“…(B) Compression modulus of a range of agarose concentrations showing a decrease in compression modulus in successively lower agarose concentrations. …”
-
7392
The Effect of Chronic Stress on Apoptosis Regulation and Oncogenesis Evolution: A Theoretical Approach.
Published 2025“…<br>Chronic stress disrupts the apoptotic process and contributes to<br>tumorigenesis. In particular, we seek to illustrate the epigenetic influence of stress on genes that control apoptosis, as well as the significance of the HPA axis as a therapeutic target for restoring cellular equilibrium. …”
-
7393
-
7394
Distribution of study areas.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7395
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7396
Code.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7397
Schematic of the conclusions.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7398
Robustness test.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7399
Data.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7400
Contents of PIO Program.
Published 2025“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”