Table1_Efficacy and safety of guanxinshutong capsule combined with western medicine on stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis.DOC by Liyuan Yu (5341841)

“…GXST and WM combination was significantly more effective than WM alone across several metrics: clinical efficacy rate (odds ratio [OR] = 4.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.42–4.80), electrocardiogram improvement (OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 2.35–4.87), enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD] = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.69–1.46), reduction in total cholesterol levels (MD = −0.78, 95% CI = −1.20 to −0.35), decrease in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (MD = −1.36, 95% CI = −2.18 to −0.53), and improvement in Chinese medicine evidence score (OR = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.20–6.43). …”

Image3_Efficacy and safety of guanxinshutong capsule combined with western medicine on stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JPEG by Liyuan Yu (5341841)

“…GXST and WM combination was significantly more effective than WM alone across several metrics: clinical efficacy rate (odds ratio [OR] = 4.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.42–4.80), electrocardiogram improvement (OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 2.35–4.87), enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD] = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.69–1.46), reduction in total cholesterol levels (MD = −0.78, 95% CI = −1.20 to −0.35), decrease in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (MD = −1.36, 95% CI = −2.18 to −0.53), and improvement in Chinese medicine evidence score (OR = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.20–6.43). …”

Table2_Efficacy and safety of guanxinshutong capsule combined with western medicine on stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis.DOC by Liyuan Yu (5341841)

“…GXST and WM combination was significantly more effective than WM alone across several metrics: clinical efficacy rate (odds ratio [OR] = 4.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.42–4.80), electrocardiogram improvement (OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 2.35–4.87), enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference [MD] = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.69–1.46), reduction in total cholesterol levels (MD = −0.78, 95% CI = −1.20 to −0.35), decrease in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (MD = −1.36, 95% CI = −2.18 to −0.53), and improvement in Chinese medicine evidence score (OR = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.20–6.43). …”

Table 1_Global burden of childhood otitis media attributable to secondhand smoke from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021.docx by Bei Li (90587)

“…Joinpoint regression analysis revealed the greatest decline in ASYR occurred in 2003–2008, while the most significant decrease in ASDR occurred in 1994–1999. …”

Engineered deletions of 1-TbAd biosynthesis genes reveal gene functions and greatly expand the lipid signature. by Jacob A. Mayfield (19762468)

“…(B) Area-under-the-curve of extracted ion chromatograms tested 1-TbAd production by the parental Mtb strain (H37Rv) and single or two-gene knockouts as well as the <i>Rv3378c</i> deletion complemented with <i>Rv3378c</i>. A Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted <i>p</i> value is indicated only for significant pairwise <i>t</i> tests (*: <i>p</i> < 0.05, **: <i>p</i> < 0.01, ***: <i>p</i> < 0.001, ****: <i>p</i> < 0.0001). …”

Raw data for Figs 1, 2, 3, 4 and S2. by Areej A. Alfaifi (20422411)

“…Bulk RNA-sequencing of parotid salivary glands from COVID-19 autopsies demonstrated statistically significant decreased expression of histatin and amylase genes. …”

Data Sheet 1_Plasma testosterone concentration is correlated with circulating immune cell abundance in transgender young people on gender-affirming hormone treatment.pdf by Alice A. White (21695726)

“…Differences in the abundance of other T cell subsets were detected in both trans males and trans females, however only a decrease in CD161⁺ T effector memory cells in trans males, compared to control females, was associated with lower testosterone levels. …”

Vinpocetine improves survival rate in DENA-exposed rats. by Osama A. Mohammed (18548092)

“…<p>The administration of DENA led to a gradual decrease in rats’ survival over the experimental period. …”

GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Funnel plot of VO_2Peak inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”

Multiple comparisons after ANOVA(CR10). by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”

Homogeneity test of CR10. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”

Illustration of the fNIRS device worn. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”

Analysis of variance of HbO₂ in bilateral PFC. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”

fNIRS equipment coordinates. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”