يعرض 301 - 320 نتائج من 18,079 نتيجة بحث عن 'significant ((((((gap decrease) OR (greater decrease))) OR (nn decrease))) OR (a decrease))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.54s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 301
  2. 302
  3. 303
  4. 304

    Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index. حسب Søren Egstrand (10906087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …"
  5. 305

    Microhardness of various samples. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  6. 306

    Shot peening process parameters. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  7. 307

    Schematic diagram of pin-disk wear. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  8. 308

    Parameters of the sliding wear test. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  9. 309

    Finite element model of shot peening. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  10. 310

    Wear morphology of the UT sample. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  11. 311

    Surface roughness of various samples. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  12. 312
  13. 313
  14. 314
  15. 315

    Table 2 - حسب Rosanna Mary Rooney (17595801)

    منشور في 2024
    "…Despite a global decrease over the last 30 years, youth crime remains prevalent. …"
  16. 316

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  17. 317

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  18. 318

    Sample attribute table. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  19. 319

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  20. 320

    Sample scenario description. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"