Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
3501
Image 1_The immediate pain relief of low-level laser therapy for burning mouth syndrome: a retrospective study of 94 cases.tif
Published 2024“…</p>Results<p>After standardized LLLT session, 71.3% of patients reported an immediate pain decrease. Compared to pre-LLLT treatment, the VAS immediately post-LLLT was significantly reduced (P < 0.001). …”
-
3502
Table 6_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3503
Image 1_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.jpeg
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3504
Table 1_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3505
Image 4_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.jpeg
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3506
Table 7_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3507
Table 4_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3508
Table 5_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3509
Table 2_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3510
Image 3_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.jpeg
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3511
Image 5_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.jpeg
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3512
Table 3_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3513
Table 9_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3514
Table 8_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.xlsx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3515
Image 2_Single-cell transcriptomics reveals the heterogeneity and function of mast cells in human ccRCC.jpeg
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>We identified four MC signature genes (TPSB2, TPSAB1, CPA3, and HPGDS). MC density was significantly greater in ccRCC tissues than in normal tissues, but MC activation characteristics were not significantly different between ccRCC and normal tissues. …”
-
3516
Supplementary Material for: The power of a good word: Enhancing the efficacy of analgesics in clinical settings
Published 2024“…In study 2, in the last two timepoints of assessment, participants in the EC arm also consumed fewer doses of opioids than participants in the RC arm (p<0.001). No significant differences were found in vital signs. Conclusions: We provide ecological evidence that positive information about treatment significantly decreases pain and opioid consumption during routine clinical care. …”
-
3517
Hardness preference in <i>Drosophila</i> larvae, as a relevant cue for varying feeding substrates.
Published 2025“…B’: Relative hardness of agarose concentrations normalised to the mean 2.5% agarose hardness (error bars too small to visualise). …”
-
3518
Data Sheet 1_Ectomycorrhizal response to bark beetle attack: a comparison of dead and surviving trees.pdf
Published 2025“…The dry biomass of fine roots was significantly greater in living trees. Fine root abundance showed a slight decrease over time in living and dead trees; however, there was a lack of statistical significance. …”
-
3519
Data Sheet 2_Ectomycorrhizal response to bark beetle attack: a comparison of dead and surviving trees.docx
Published 2025“…The dry biomass of fine roots was significantly greater in living trees. Fine root abundance showed a slight decrease over time in living and dead trees; however, there was a lack of statistical significance. …”
-
3520
Exposure to environments with different norms changes participants’ behavior.
Published 2025“…The shaded grey line represents the mean and standard error across participants. The grey boxes show the percentage of participants who showed an increase, decrease, or no change in their prosocial action. …”