بدائل البحث:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
gap decrease » gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), step decrease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (توسيع البحث), greater increase (توسيع البحث), greater disease (توسيع البحث)
gap decrease » gain decreased (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث), step decrease (توسيع البحث)
we decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), nn decrease (توسيع البحث), mean decrease (توسيع البحث)
a decrease » _ decrease (توسيع البحث), _ decreased (توسيع البحث), _ decreases (توسيع البحث)
-
441
-
442
Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index.
منشور في 2025"…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …"
-
443
-
444
-
445
-
446
-
447
-
448
-
449
-
450
-
451
-
452
-
453
-
454
Table 2 -
منشور في 2024"…Despite a global decrease over the last 30 years, youth crime remains prevalent. …"
-
455
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
456
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
457
Sample attribute table.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
458
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
459
Sample scenario description.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
-
460
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"