يعرض 441 - 460 نتائج من 18,205 نتيجة بحث عن 'significant ((((((gap decrease) OR (greater decrease))) OR (we decrease))) OR (a decrease))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.67s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 441
  2. 442

    Cinacalcet administered early in the inactive phase markedly decrease parathyroid Ki-67 index. حسب Søren Egstrand (10906087)

    منشور في 2025
    "…All groups were compared by Kruskal Wallis test with <i>post hoc</i> test after Dunn with Bonferroni adjustment showing significant decreased Ki-67 labeling index of <i>Cina1</i> compared to <i>Cina2</i> (p = 0.006) and the untreated CKD groups (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively). …"
  3. 443

    Microhardness of various samples. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  4. 444

    Shot peening process parameters. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  5. 445

    Schematic diagram of pin-disk wear. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  6. 446

    Parameters of the sliding wear test. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  7. 447

    Finite element model of shot peening. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  8. 448

    Wear morphology of the UT sample. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  9. 449

    Surface roughness of various samples. حسب Huashen Guan (20454677)

    منشور في 2024
    الموضوعات:
  10. 450
  11. 451
  12. 452
  13. 453
  14. 454

    Table 2 - حسب Rosanna Mary Rooney (17595801)

    منشور في 2024
    "…Despite a global decrease over the last 30 years, youth crime remains prevalent. …"
  15. 455

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  16. 456

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  17. 457

    Sample attribute table. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  18. 458

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  19. 459

    Sample scenario description. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"
  20. 460

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. حسب Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    منشور في 2025
    "…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …"