Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
7281
Data Sheet 1_A systematic review of the effects of nanoplastics on fish.pdf
Published 2025“…Although the USEPA and EU are aware of the global impacts of plastic pollution, the prolonged persistence of plastics continues to pose a significant risk to both aquatic life and human health.…”
-
7282
-
7283
Supplementary Material for: Trends in the Incidence of Rare Eyelid Malignancies: A SEER-Based Study (2000–2021)
Published 2025“…For SGC; ARIMA (0,0,0) model demonstrated a decline in IR in 2011 (IR = 0.0192), increase until 2019, then decrease in 2021 (IR = 0.0246), with a predicted 10-year decrease to 0.026 (95% PI: 0.019–0.032). …”
-
7284
Efficacy of lifting devices for wheelchair transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 2024“…Motorised lifting devices significantly decreased biomechanical stress among nurses [SMD −0.68; 95% CI −1.02 to −0.34], whereas non-motorised counterparts showed no significant change [SMD − 0.23; 95% CI −0.59 to 0.13]. …”
-
7285
Supplementary Material for: The power of a good word: Enhancing the efficacy of analgesics in clinical settings
Published 2024“…In study 2, in the last two timepoints of assessment, participants in the EC arm also consumed fewer doses of opioids than participants in the RC arm (p<0.001). No significant differences were found in vital signs. Conclusions: We provide ecological evidence that positive information about treatment significantly decreases pain and opioid consumption during routine clinical care. …”
-
7286
RSA results across a broader frequency band (0.1–150 Hz).
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> For the translation epochs from good trials, the similarity of Same Context was significantly greater than the similarity of Different Context in HC. …”
-
7287
Table 1_Gut microbiota dysbiosis in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.docx
Published 2024“…In terms of specific microbial families, we observed a significant decrease in the abundance of Bifidobacterium (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI: -2.37, 1.52; P < 0.001), which is known for its beneficial effects on gut health. …”
-
7288
Parameters of Tissue Doppler Echocardiography.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Out of 50 patients, two showed a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the normal range (<55%) one month post-treatment, along with significant increases in Troponin I levels. …”
-
7289
Hardness preference in <i>Drosophila</i> larvae, as a relevant cue for varying feeding substrates.
Published 2025“…(B) Compression modulus of a range of agarose concentrations showing a decrease in compression modulus in successively lower agarose concentrations. …”
-
7290
-
7291
Distribution of study areas.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7292
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7293
Code.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7294
Schematic of the conclusions.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7295
Robustness test.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7296
Data.
Published 2024“…(main findings) The results show the following: (1) the primary term of government innovation preferences has a positive effect on the ecological resilience of resource-based cities, and the secondary term has a negative effect, with a decreasing marginal effect. …”
-
7297
Contents of PIO Program.
Published 2025“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”
-
7298
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”
-
7299
Social robot PIO (version 3.5).
Published 2025“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”
-
7300
12 session programs of social robot PIO.
Published 2025“…The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (<i>t</i> = 3.94, <i>p</i><.001). Depression decreased -0.7±3.48 in the experimental group, from 5.9±4.74 before intervention to 5.2±4.65 after intervention, and decreased by -0.2±3.42, from 6.5±4.69 before intervention to 6.4±4.08 after intervention, in the control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (<i>z</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> =.557). …”