Ablation experiments of various block. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

Kappa coefficients for different algorithms. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

The structure of ASPP+ block. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

The structure of attention gate block [31]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

DSC block and its application network structure. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

The structure of multi-scale residual block [30]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

The structure of IRAU and Res2Net+ block [22]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”

Areal densities of single targets in the feeding areas of northern and southern resident killer whales. by Burak Saygili (19832062)

Two-dimensional quadrant analysis of cherry shrimp (<i>N</i>. <i>davidi</i> var. red) bodycolor parameters (<i>L*</i> and <i>a*</i> values) in different feed treatment groups on da... by Wei-Wei Hou (3405947)

Analysis of stress-related gene expression in cherry shrimp (<i>N</i>. <i>davidi</i> var. red). by Wei-Wei Hou (3405947)

Correlations between feed additives and color-related genes. by Wei-Wei Hou (3405947)

Accuracy on the ERAM task. by Daisung Jang (16781451)

“…However, coefficients for estrogen were significant for both emotion recognition tasks. Higher within-person levels of estrogen predicted lower accuracy, whereas higher between-person estrogen levels predicted greater accuracy. …”

Dataset visualization diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Dataset sample images. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

Performance comparison of different models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

BiFormer structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”

YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”