Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
-
1841
-
1842
-
1843
-
1844
-
1845
-
1846
-
1847
-
1848
-
1849
-
1850
-
1851
-
1852
-
1853
-
1854
-
1855
Digital Microfluidic Platform Based on Printed Circuit Board for Affinity Evaluation of Mertansine Aptamers
Published 2025“…Compared with manual methods, the digital microfluidic platform not only reduced the time for a single determination from 105 to 45 min but also significantly decreased the reagent consumption from 1280 to 30.72 μL. …”
-
1856
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1857
Classification of hand grip strength.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1858
Rating scale for functional severity [28].
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1859
Regression model coefficients.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1860
ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”