Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
361
-
362
-
363
Cellular migration in LECs of βA3ΔG91 vs. WT mice using the scratch and transwell assays.
Published 2025Subjects: -
364
-
365
-
366
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…</b> The KEGG pathway analysis identifies the number of target genes within each pathway. Those with a p-value < 0.05 are considered significant. <b>L.…”
-
367
Analysis of cellular proliferation in βA3ΔG91 vs. WT mice lenses using BrdU assay.
Published 2025Subjects: -
368
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
369
-
370
-
371
-
372
-
373
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. …”
-
374
-
375
-
376
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
377
-
378
-
379
-
380