Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
1061
-
1062
-
1063
-
1064
-
1065
<i>Kif15</i> deficiency affects the expression of excitatory postsynaptic receptors in PFC and hippocampus.
Published 2025“…All the data are presented as mean±SD, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed student’s t test were used for comparison between two groups, expect for the GluA1 of J, which was used as a nonparametric test.…”
-
1066
-
1067
Vertebral cancellous tissueμCT parameters are not significantly affected by aging from 16 to 21 weeks, housing type, or microgravity.
Published 2025“…Nonsignificant trends implicate an effect of spaceflight reducing BV/TV, increasing DA, and reducing Tb.N. Data shown are the mean ± standard deviation with a scatter plot (ns: non-significant). …”
-
1068
-
1069
Lipidomic analysis of epidermis using LC-IMS-CID-MS reveals major changes in CKO// epidermis.
Published 2025“…(I) Significantly changed ceramides (Cer) in CKO vs K5Cre epidermis (p0.05 ANOVA) heatmap with mean fold change shown for each ceramide.…”
-
1070
Statistical summaries.
Published 2025“…In this study, it was shown for the first time that honeybees kept in apiaries have higher levels and activity of the studied parameters than honeybees kept in the laboratory. The greatest difference was noted in the case of PO activity in 28-day-old infected honeybees in May, when the activity was 32.3 times higher in honeybees kept in the apiary than in the laboratory, suggesting that environmental conditions have a significant influence on the immune response of honeybees. …”
-
1071
-
1072
-
1073
Amplitude for A/L = 0.29.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1074
Top view of the experimental setup.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1075
Amplitude for A/L = 0.338.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1076
Parameters of energy harvesting.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1077
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1078
Amplitude for A/L = 0.02.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1079
Graph for maximum Frequency at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”
-
1080
Graph for maximum Power at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”