Showing 7,321 - 7,340 results of 18,047 for search 'significant ((((((shape decrease) OR (small decrease))) OR (greatest decrease))) OR (a decrease))', query time: 0.78s Refine Results
  1. 7321

    Network plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  2. 7322

    Network plot for scar thickness. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  3. 7323

    Funnel plot for VSS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  4. 7324

    Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17). by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  5. 7325

    Risk of bias graph. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  6. 7326

    Network plot for VAS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  7. 7327

    Funnel plot for VAS score. by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

    Published 2025
    “…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
  8. 7328
  9. 7329
  10. 7330

    Image 3_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif by Sheng-Yi He (20373678)

    Published 2024
    “…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
  11. 7331

    Image 4_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif by Sheng-Yi He (20373678)

    Published 2024
    “…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
  12. 7332

    Image 2_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif by Sheng-Yi He (20373678)

    Published 2024
    “…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
  13. 7333

    Image 1_Quantifying the split-elbow sign: a comprehensive study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.tif by Sheng-Yi He (20373678)

    Published 2024
    “…Furthermore, there was a notable decrease in SEI<sub>MUNIX</sub> values as the disease progressed (p < 0.001). …”
  14. 7334
  15. 7335
  16. 7336

    Epidural Hydromorphone for Postpartum Pain Management After Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial by Yixing Lu (19234084)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p dir="ltr"><b>Key Points</b></p><p dir="ltr"><b>Question</b></p><p dir="ltr">In women post-vaginal delivery, does the administration of epidural hydromorphone offer superior analgesia and enhance maternal satisfaction relative to a placebo (normal saline)?</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr"><b>Findings</b></p><p dir="ltr">Epidural hydromorphone demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in postpartum pain scores, a decreased requirement for supplemental analgesics, and enhanced maternal satisfaction. …”
  17. 7337

    Variability in performance and response to task dynamics. by Daniel Ramandi (10047543)

    Published 2025
    “…(E) When focusing on five consecutive successful trials, WT mice showed a significant reduction in trajectory variability, whereas zQ175 mice exhibited only a slight decrease, predominantly in the last trial, hinting at genotype-specific differences in optimizing performance following success (RM two-way ANOVA, genotype p = 0.746 F(1, 22) = 0.1074, trial p = 0.012 F(2.836, 62.38) = 4.045, interaction p = 0.018 F(3, 66) = 3.561). …”
  18. 7338
  19. 7339
  20. 7340