Search alternatives:
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
shape decrease » shape increases (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
641
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
642
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
643
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
644
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
645
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
646
-
647
-
648
Trends in the characteristics of women giving birth vaginally in France between 2010 and 2021.
Published 2025Subjects: -
649
-
650
-
651
-
652
-
653
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
654
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
655
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
656
-
657
-
658
-
659
-
660