Showing 841 - 860 results of 17,946 for search 'significant ((((((side decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (step decrease))) OR (teer decrease))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 841

    Image 1_PABPN1 as a pan-cancer biomarker: prognostic significance and association with tumor immune microenvironment.tif by Hong-Xing Li (316258)

    Published 2025
    “…After down expression of PABPN1, mRNA expression levels of MRPS15 and GPx (Glutathione peroxidase) decreased significantly in T24, 5637 HLF and MCF-7 cells.…”
  2. 842
  3. 843
  4. 844
  5. 845

    Baseline patient characteristics. by Oscar F. C. van den Bosch (22184246)

    Published 2025
    “…While mean respiratory rate was not affected, midazolam resulted in a significant decrease in both VRR (ß = −0.071, 95% CI: −0.120 to −0.021) and VTV (ß = −0.117, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.062). …”
  6. 846
  7. 847
  8. 848
  9. 849
  10. 850
  11. 851

    DataSheet1_Pharmacological inhibition of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase β/ζ decreases Aβ plaques and neuroinflammation in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice.docx by Teresa Fontán-Baselga (20392470)

    Published 2024
    “…In addition, we observed a significant decrease in the number and size of astrocytes in both sexes and in the number of microglial cells in a sex-dependent manner. …”
  12. 852
  13. 853
  14. 854

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  15. 855

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  16. 856

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  17. 857

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  18. 858
  19. 859
  20. 860