Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
2921
-
2922
Validation of model predictions of growth during infusion of hypertrophic agonists with and without receptor blockers.
Published 2025“…Points with error bars indicate experimental mean±SD for studies reporting statistically significant effects (filled markers) or non-significant effects (open markers), from studies in dogs (circles) or rats (triangles).…”
-
2923
Early and progressive microstructural damage is present in Fabry disease.
Published 2025“…Associations between age and fractional anisotropy (FA; e) and mean diffusivity (MD, f) demonstrate a decrease and increase, respectively in the Fabry cohort with similar trends in controls. …”
-
2924
Knockdown of <i>fhplk1</i> disrupts growth and cell proliferation in juvenile <i>Fasciola hepatica in vitro.</i>
Published 2025“…<b>(C)</b> Mean # EdU<sup>+</sup> nuclei ±SEM significantly decreased after four weeks of <i>fhplk1</i> dsRNA treatments in juvenile <i>F. hepatica</i> (n ≥ 15 for each treatment; Mann-Whitney U test). …”
-
2925
Effects of receptor blockers on VO-induced hypertrophy in published experiments and the calibrated model.
Published 2025“…Blue coloring of boxplot indicates predicted decrease in >75% of simulations, gray boxplots indicate mixed simulation results, filled markers indicate experimental means associated with statistically significant effects and open markers indicate means associated with non-significant effects.…”
-
2926
-
2927
Effects of βHB treatment on edema and NDS 3 days after ICH.
Published 2024“…<p>A) In experiment 2, body weight was decreased on day 1 after ICH (p<0.0001), but not different between treatment groups at all times assessed (all p≥0.2118). …”
-
2928
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2929
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2930
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
2931
-
2932
Initial assessment of βHB treatment effects.
Published 2024“…This increase was significantly reduced in the βHB group (p = 0.0210). …”
-
2933
-
2934
-
2935
Grid division diagram.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
2936
Model calculation diagram.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
2937
Grid independence verification.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
2938
-
2939
-
2940