Showing 2,921 - 2,940 results of 4,684 for search 'significant ((((((step decrease) OR (greater decrease))) OR (nn decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.61s Refine Results
  1. 2921
  2. 2922

    Validation of model predictions of growth during infusion of hypertrophic agonists with and without receptor blockers. by Johane H. Bracamonte (12883844)

    Published 2025
    “…Points with error bars indicate experimental mean±SD for studies reporting statistically significant effects (filled markers) or non-significant effects (open markers), from studies in dogs (circles) or rats (triangles).…”
  3. 2923

    Early and progressive microstructural damage is present in Fabry disease. by Jacob W. Johnson (20172850)

    Published 2025
    “…Associations between age and fractional anisotropy (FA; e) and mean diffusivity (MD, f) demonstrate a decrease and increase, respectively in the Fabry cohort with similar trends in controls. …”
  4. 2924

    Knockdown of <i>fhplk1</i> disrupts growth and cell proliferation in juvenile <i>Fasciola hepatica in vitro.</i> by Paul McCusker (634425)

    Published 2025
    “…<b>(C)</b> Mean # EdU<sup>+</sup> nuclei ±SEM significantly decreased after four weeks of <i>fhplk1</i> dsRNA treatments in juvenile <i>F. hepatica</i> (n ≥ 15 for each treatment; Mann-Whitney U test). …”
  5. 2925

    Effects of receptor blockers on VO-induced hypertrophy in published experiments and the calibrated model. by Johane H. Bracamonte (12883844)

    Published 2025
    “…Blue coloring of boxplot indicates predicted decrease in >75% of simulations, gray boxplots indicate mixed simulation results, filled markers indicate experimental means associated with statistically significant effects and open markers indicate means associated with non-significant effects.…”
  6. 2926
  7. 2927

    Effects of βHB treatment on edema and NDS 3 days after ICH. by Noam H. Sander (13977976)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>A) In experiment 2, body weight was decreased on day 1 after ICH (p<0.0001), but not different between treatment groups at all times assessed (all p≥0.2118). …”
  8. 2928

    Experimental procedures. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  9. 2929

    Experimental procedures. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  10. 2930

    Supplementary file of datasets. by Ellen Chan (22177558)

    Published 2025
    “…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
  11. 2931
  12. 2932

    Initial assessment of βHB treatment effects. by Noam H. Sander (13977976)

    Published 2024
    “…This increase was significantly reduced in the βHB group (p = 0.0210). …”
  13. 2933
  14. 2934
  15. 2935

    Grid division diagram. by Ming Zhang (9736)

    Published 2025
    “…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
  16. 2936

    Model calculation diagram. by Ming Zhang (9736)

    Published 2025
    “…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
  17. 2937

    Grid independence verification. by Ming Zhang (9736)

    Published 2025
    “…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
  18. 2938
  19. 2939
  20. 2940