Showing 2,441 - 2,460 results of 4,684 for search 'significant ((((((step decrease) OR (nn decrease))) OR (greater decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.66s Refine Results
  1. 2441

    DSC block and its application network structure. by Yingying Liu (360782)

    Published 2025
    “…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
  2. 2442

    The structure of multi-scale residual block [30]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

    Published 2025
    “…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
  3. 2443

    The structure of IRAU and Res2Net+ block [22]. by Yingying Liu (360782)

    Published 2025
    “…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
  4. 2444
  5. 2445
  6. 2446
  7. 2447
  8. 2448

    Accuracy on the ERAM task. by Daisung Jang (16781451)

    Published 2024
    “…However, coefficients for estrogen were significant for both emotion recognition tasks. Higher within-person levels of estrogen predicted lower accuracy, whereas higher between-person estrogen levels predicted greater accuracy. …”
  9. 2449

    Dataset visualization diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  10. 2450

    Dataset sample images. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  11. 2451

    Performance comparison of different models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  12. 2452

    C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  13. 2453

    YOLOv8n detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  14. 2454

    YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  15. 2455

    BiFormer structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  16. 2456

    YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  17. 2457

    GSConv module structure diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  18. 2458

    Performance comparison of three loss functions. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  19. 2459

    mAP0.5 Curves of various models. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
  20. 2460

    Network loss function change diagram. by Yaojun Zhang (389482)

    Published 2025
    “…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”