يعرض 2,521 - 2,540 نتائج من 8,891 نتيجة بحث عن 'significant ((((((step decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (teer decrease))) OR (mean decrease))', وقت الاستعلام: 0.62s تنقيح النتائج
  1. 2521

    Raw data V-trial. حسب Torsten Schober (20485754)

    منشور في 2024
    "…In the context of standardized production, we therefore advocate high-density production systems that increase the proportion of desired inflorescence fractions from upper canopy layers.…"
  2. 2522

    Raw data D-trial. حسب Torsten Schober (20485754)

    منشور في 2024
    "…In the context of standardized production, we therefore advocate high-density production systems that increase the proportion of desired inflorescence fractions from upper canopy layers.…"
  3. 2523

    Fig 9 - حسب Torsten Schober (20485754)

    منشور في 2024
  4. 2524

    Fig 8 - حسب Torsten Schober (20485754)

    منشور في 2024
  5. 2525

    Addressing Imbalanced Classification Problems in Drug Discovery and Development Using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, AutoGluon-Tabular, and H2O AutoML حسب Ayush Garg (21090944)

    منشور في 2025
    "…The important findings of our studies are as follows: (i) there is no effect of threshold optimization on ranking metrics such as AUC and AUPR, but AUC and AUPR get affected by class-weighting and SMOTTomek; (ii) for ML methods RF and SVM, significant percentage improvement up to 375, 33.33, and 450 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy, which are suitable for performance evaluation of imbalanced data sets; (iii) for AutoML libraries AutoGluon-Tabular and H2O AutoML, significant percentage improvement up to 383.33, 37.25, and 533.33 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy; (iv) the general pattern of percentage improvement in balanced accuracy is that the percentage improvement increases when the class ratio is systematically decreased from 0.5 to 0.1; in the case of F1 score and MCC, maximum improvement is achieved at the class ratio of 0.3; (v) for both ML and AutoML with balancing, it is observed that any individual class-balancing technique does not outperform all other methods on a significantly higher number of data sets based on F1 score; (vi) the three external balancing techniques combined outperformed the internal balancing methods of the ML and AutoML; (vii) AutoML tools perform as good as the ML models and in some cases perform even better for handling imbalanced classification when applied with imbalance handling techniques. …"
  6. 2526
  7. 2527
  8. 2528
  9. 2529
  10. 2530
  11. 2531
  12. 2532
  13. 2533

    Fig 4 - حسب Leena Inkilä (20614460)

    منشور في 2025
  14. 2534
  15. 2535
  16. 2536
  17. 2537
  18. 2538
  19. 2539
  20. 2540