Showing 8,401 - 8,420 results of 18,313 for search 'significant ((((a decrease) OR (((greatest decrease) OR (nn decrease))))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.69s Refine Results
  1. 8401

    Vinpocetine improves survival rate in DENA-exposed rats. by Osama A. Mohammed (18548092)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>The administration of DENA led to a gradual decrease in rats’ survival over the experimental period. …”
  2. 8402

    GRADE judgements. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  3. 8403

    Basic characteristics of the included studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  4. 8404

    The data of meta-analysis. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  5. 8405

    Risk of bias. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  6. 8406

    Overall risk of bias assessment. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  7. 8407

    Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  8. 8408

    Analysis of subgroups. by Da Huang (1306407)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
  9. 8409

    Multiple comparisons after ANOVA(CR10). by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  10. 8410

    Homogeneity test of CR10. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  11. 8411

    Illustration of the fNIRS device worn. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  12. 8412

    Analysis of variance of HbO<sub>2</sub> in bilateral PFC. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  13. 8413

    fNIRS equipment coordinates. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  14. 8414

    Changes of muscle oxygen saturation. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  15. 8415

    Analysis of variance of CR10. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  16. 8416

    Placement on the forehead. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  17. 8417

    IMW intervention plan design. by Xinyu Dai (5100731)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Following the intervention, a significant difference in CR10 was observed between the various groups. …”
  18. 8418

    Supplementary Material for: Spontaneous Massive Retroperitoneal Hematoma: A Rare Complication of Anticoagulation after Stenting in Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome by figshare admin karger (2628495)

    Published 2025
    “…After the procedure, she was on prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin and developed a large retroperitoneal hematoma with a significant decrease in haemoglobin on day four. …”
  19. 8419
  20. 8420

    Table 1_Influence of intraoperative electromyographic changes and surgical extent on post-thyroidectomy esophageal motility: a prospective cohort study.docx by Mehmet Gunay (14384565)

    Published 2025
    “…Postoperative upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure (UESRP) significantly decreased from a median of 181 mmHg (range: 12–407 mmHg) to 109 mmHg (range: 8.6–407 mmHg), postoperatively (p=0.03). …”