Showing 1,541 - 1,560 results of 18,449 for search 'significant ((((a decrease) OR (((nn decrease) OR (greater decrease))))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.62s Refine Results
  1. 1541

    Table1_Leaf nutrient traits exhibit greater environmental plasticity compared to resource utilization traits along an elevational gradient.xlsx by Xing Zhang (11943)

    Published 2024
    “…Generally, as elevation increased, SLA decreased, while LDMC significantly increased (P < 0.001), and LN first increase and then decreased (P < 0.001). …”
  2. 1542
  3. 1543
  4. 1544
  5. 1545

    Laab Nuer<sup>a</sup>. <sup>a</sup> Photographed by Vivat Keawdounglek. by Vivat Keawdounglek (9710710)

    Published 2025
    “…In the downstream operation, which refers to the consumers, this study included a questionnaire to measure the level of agreement for the different factors by using the One Way ANOVA at the 0.05 level of significance. …”
  6. 1546
  7. 1547
  8. 1548
  9. 1549
  10. 1550
  11. 1551
  12. 1552
  13. 1553
  14. 1554
  15. 1555

    Data Sheet 1_Expression and prognostic significance of the m6A RNA methylation regulator HNRNPC in HNSCC.docx by Yulin Zhang (510822)

    Published 2025
    “…Knockdown of HNRNPC in the HNSCC cell lines HSC-3 and CAL-27 resulted in a significant decrease in proliferation, invasion, and malignant transformation abilities. …”
  16. 1556
  17. 1557
  18. 1558
  19. 1559

    Risk of bias summary. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
  20. 1560

    Criteria for study selection. by Duc Tran Quang (20564967)

    Published 2025
    “…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”