Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1161
-
1162
-
1163
-
1164
Surgical changes through ISIW implantation.
Published 2025“…Pre- and postoperative data are compared by Tukey’s HSD test and asterisks mean statistical significance (p < 0.05). IOP decreases significantly from 3 to 12 months after surgery whereas GMS decreases from one day to 12 months after surgery. …”
-
1165
-
1166
NIE ELISA results.
Published 2025“…Using a logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, baseline hookworm prevalence, and village drug coverage, IDA resulted in a 45% greater reduction in hookworm prevalence than DA (Odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI [0.31,0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.049). …”
-
1167
Kato Katz and PCR database 12 months collection.
Published 2025“…Using a logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, baseline hookworm prevalence, and village drug coverage, IDA resulted in a 45% greater reduction in hookworm prevalence than DA (Odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI [0.31,0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.049). …”
-
1168
Master database baseline, 4 weeks and 1 year.
Published 2025“…Using a logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, baseline hookworm prevalence, and village drug coverage, IDA resulted in a 45% greater reduction in hookworm prevalence than DA (Odds ratio 0.55, 95% CI [0.31,0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.049). …”
-
1169
Results of the LMM analysis for IOP change.
Published 2025“…The mean GMS was 2.46 ± 1.33 preoperatively, and decreased to 1.32 ± 1.31 at 3 months, and 1.60 ± 1.41 at 12 months postoperatively. …”
-
1170
Results of the LMM analysis for GMS change.
Published 2025“…The mean GMS was 2.46 ± 1.33 preoperatively, and decreased to 1.32 ± 1.31 at 3 months, and 1.60 ± 1.41 at 12 months postoperatively. …”
-
1171
-
1172
-
1173
-
1174
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1175
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1176
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1177
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1178
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1179
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1180
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”