Showing 621 - 640 results of 18,343 for search 'significant ((((gap decrease) OR (((greatest decrease) OR (a decrease))))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.72s Refine Results
  1. 621

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  2. 622

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  3. 623

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  4. 624

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  5. 625

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  6. 626

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  7. 627

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  8. 628
  9. 629
  10. 630
  11. 631

    The Date. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

    Published 2025
    “…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
  12. 632

    Variation curve of the extreme temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

    Published 2025
    “…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
  13. 633
  14. 634
  15. 635

    CIE L*a*b* color space values of urine measured by a spectrophotometer showed significant correlations with Uturb as observed through visual examination. by Jingnan Liu (2219029)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(A) The increase in Uturb was significantly correlated with a decrease in urine brightness (L*). …”
  16. 636
  17. 637
  18. 638
  19. 639
  20. 640