Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
3481
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Music Performance Anxiety, a subset of social anxiety disorder (SAD), can significantly impede the lives of professional voice users (PVUs). …”
-
3482
-
3483
Barnes maze testing in animals on post-injury day 1.
Published 2025“…(A) Briefly, animals received acclimation and then four days of acquisition with expected decreasing mean times to escape. (B) On post-injury day 1, animals received a probe test, and escape latencies for each group are shown. …”
-
3484
Rank of mutation fitness.
Published 2025“…Retrospective validation demonstrated that CoVPF achieved 20.7% higher accuracy compared to previous study. Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. …”
-
3485
Key modeling details for CoVPF and controls.
Published 2025“…Retrospective validation demonstrated that CoVPF achieved 20.7% higher accuracy compared to previous study. Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. …”
-
3486
Isolation and characterization of the <i>clr4–1</i> mutant strain.
Published 2025“…Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined using a one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, with WT as the reference sample (*<i>p</i> < 0.05 and **<i>p</i> < 0.01; N.S.: not significant).…”
-
3487
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3488
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3489
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3490
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3491
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3492
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3493
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3494
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3495
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
3496
The six most abundant miRNAs within AdMSC-EVs.
Published 2025“…We next demonstrated that AdMSC-EVs accelerated the migration of LECs in a scratch assay, whereas the proliferation of LECs was decreased by AdMSC-EVs in the cell proliferation assay. …”
-
3497
Disruption of OGG1-RNA interaction reduces RSV progeny production.
Published 2024“…Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired Student’s <i>t</i> test, with results shown as means ± SD. Significance levels are indicated as **<i>p</i> < 0.01, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001.…”
-
3498
Tryptamine Metabolism and Functionalization in Gut Commensal Bacteria Expand Human Tryptamine Signaling Responses
Published 2025“…Despite their potential significance, the variety of functional small molecules known in the gut is relatively limited. …”
-
3499
-
3500
Primers for qPCR.
Published 2024“…Our results indicated that PGAM5 was significantly elevated by I/R injury, and predominantly localized in the necrosis area. …”