Search alternatives:
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
-
1641
-
1642
-
1643
-
1644
-
1645
-
1646
-
1647
-
1648
-
1649
-
1650
-
1651
-
1652
-
1653
-
1654
-
1655
-
1656
Predictors in ordinal regression model for GDS.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1657
Classification of hand grip strength.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1658
Rating scale for functional severity [28].
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1659
Regression model coefficients.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”
-
1660
ICOPE screening positive participant’s responses.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The sample had a mean BMI of 27.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (95% CI [26.99, 28.07], SD = 5.49), with an obesity prevalence of 31.82%. …”