Showing 1,681 - 1,700 results of 5,113 for search 'significant ((((gap decrease) OR (((step decrease) OR (greater decrease))))) OR (mean decrease))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 1681
  2. 1682
  3. 1683
  4. 1684
  5. 1685
  6. 1686
  7. 1687

    Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients. by Michele Angelo Colombo (22446342)

    Published 2025
    “…The shaded area indicates the bootstrapped 95% confidence interval for the geometric mean across participants. <b>(B)</b> The PSD in the Slow Delta band (0.5–2 Hz) was significantly larger in the disconnected (Discon) than in the contralateral (Contra) cortex, only in the session after surgery. …”
  8. 1688
  9. 1689
  10. 1690

    Flowchart of the study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean age of study participants was 57 years and women reported significantly higher stress levels on PSS-10 than men [Women: 13.6 ± 5.6; Men: 12.4 ± 5.3; p < 0.01]. …”
  11. 1691

    Characteristics of study population. by Gábor Szaló (22615130)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean age of study participants was 57 years and women reported significantly higher stress levels on PSS-10 than men [Women: 13.6 ± 5.6; Men: 12.4 ± 5.3; p < 0.01]. …”
  12. 1692

    CaCl<sub>2</sub> and MnCl<sub>2</sub> treatment significantly reduced Pol I occupancy on the rDNA template. by Abigail K. Huffines (20721555)

    Published 2025
    “…If the <i>p</i>-value < 0.05, that was deemed a significant difference between the two treatment groups and was indicated with either a green (increased occupancy) or black (decreased occupancy) line below the histogram for the CaCl<sub>2</sub> treated samples with respect to the untreated samples. …”
  13. 1693

    Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex. by Kimberly Yuin Y’ng Wong (22766265)

    Published 2025
    “…An exponential decrease in FF proximity was associated with 0.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.001) increase in BMI among males and 0.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (p < 0.05) decrease among females. …”
  14. 1694
  15. 1695
  16. 1696
  17. 1697
  18. 1698
  19. 1699
  20. 1700